Skip to content

[hotfix][test] Remove redundant keywords and lines for ForStGeneralMultiGetOperationTest.java #26481

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

RocMarshal
Copy link
Contributor

What is the purpose of the change

[hotfix][test] Remove redundant keywords and lines for ForStGeneralMultiGetOperationTest.java

Brief change log

[hotfix][test] Remove redundant keywords and lines for ForStGeneralMultiGetOperationTest.java

Verifying this change

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / no)
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): (yes / no)
  • The serializers: (yes / no / don't know)
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (yes / no / don't know)
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: (yes / no / don't know)
  • The S3 file system connector: (yes / no / don't know)

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Apr 18, 2025

CI report:

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

Copy link
Contributor

@davidradl davidradl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

trivial change

@RocMarshal
Copy link
Contributor Author

hi, @lvyanquan Could you. help take a look ? thx a lot !

Copy link
Contributor

@davidradl davidradl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Trivial change - approve

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants