pico uart buffer size #16966
Unanswered
krismc
asked this question in
RP2040 / Pico
Replies: 2 comments 5 replies
-
The rxbuf keyword argument is supported by the pico port since March 2021. Which firmware do you use? Does it simply not work or do you get an error? Which behavior do you see? Edit:
Yes they are different under the hood. But the MicroPython API is mostly the same. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
-
Impressive how you stay abreast of everything Rob, the devil is always in
the detail.
…On Mon, 24 Mar 2025, 6:52 pm Robert Hammelrath, ***@***.***> wrote:
There is a habit of lightsleep() and deepsleep() to change the peripheral
clock. Then the UART speed has to be specified again. This unexpected habit
of lightsleep() and deepsleep() was mentioned in various posts and does not
affect only UART. e.g. here: #16801
<#16801>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#16966 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACBCWGNL46TONLINXEOJKAT2V62VJAVCNFSM6AAAAABZMTWGWCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTENJZHA3DCMY>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***
com>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I'm trying to move a upython program from an esp32 to an rpi pico. The uart has to cope with a firehose of data from an external modem. On the esp32 I had to increase the receive buffer size to make this work properly
but I can't find an easy way to do similar on the pico. Are the uarts on the 2 chips really so different?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions