[.NET] How to catch content filter exception in GetStreamingChatMessageContentsAsync

[romainsemur]

When the model behind the GetStreamingChatMessageContentsAsync throws a content_filter exception, it just throw a basic exception, is there a way to throws a ContentFilterException ?

[sophialagerkranspandey]

We wanted to understand what model you're using?

[romainsemur]

GPT4o on Azure Open AI

[lovedeepatsgit]

May be you can adjust this in you Azure Foundry, Below is Screen Capture for Your Reference:

[romainsemur]

My point is the GetStreamingChatMessageContentsAsync of IChatCompletionService (i'm on Azure Open Ai) throw a generic Exception with a message like :
HTTP 401 (401)

Access denied due to invalid subscription key or wrong API endpoint. Make sure to provide a valid key for an active subscription and use a correct regional API endpoint for your resource.

Is there a way to catch an HttpRequestException to have a clear status code of the error or do we have to parse the Exception.message ?

[markwallace-microsoft]

@romainsemur just to clarify are you getting a 401 when a content filter issue happens?

[romainsemur]

@markwallace-microsoft just try again today, i'm now with the last version (1.45)
When I call GetStreamingChatMessageContentsAsync with very bad words, I got an exception (status 400) with that message :

HTTP 400 (: content_filter)
Parameter: prompt

The response was filtered due to the prompt triggering Azure OpenAI's content management policy. Please modify your prompt and retry. To learn more about our content filtering policies please read our documentation: https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=2198766

I need to parse message, my question was, is it possible to make an dedicated exception in SK for content filter exception (ContentFilterException)?

[romainsemur]

Hi again @markwallace-microsoft, I'm using Azure OpenAI (gpt4o-mini) and I often encounter unjustified and intrusive content filters. How can I retrieve the category of the content filter in the exception?

[romainsemur]

I found this issue : #9593
Closed but not fixed right ?