We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
https://github.com/elastic/detection-rules/blob/main/rules/integrations/google_workspace/persistence_google_workspace_admin_role_assigned_to_user.toml
False Negatives - Enhancing detection of true threats that were previously missed.
Currently, the query of the rule limits itself to: google_workspace.admin.role.name : *_ADMIN_ROLE
But at least custom GWS roles may have arbitrary names, which the rule would not catch.
Given the name of the rule and its description, it should catch assignments to any GWS Admin role.
Additionally to that, there is the default "_SEED_ADMIN_ROLE", a.k.a. the "Super Admin" role.
This Super Admin role is especially critical, because:
Therefore suggest the following changes:
... "google_workspace.admin.role.name": [ "My Custom Super Admin role" ], ...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Link to Rule
https://github.com/elastic/detection-rules/blob/main/rules/integrations/google_workspace/persistence_google_workspace_admin_role_assigned_to_user.toml
Rule Tuning Type
False Negatives - Enhancing detection of true threats that were previously missed.
Description
Currently, the query of the rule limits itself to:
google_workspace.admin.role.name : *_ADMIN_ROLE
But at least custom GWS roles may have arbitrary names, which the rule would not catch.
Given the name of the rule and its description, it should catch assignments to any GWS Admin role.
Additionally to that, there is the default "_SEED_ADMIN_ROLE", a.k.a. the "Super Admin" role.
This Super Admin role is especially critical, because:
Therefore suggest the following changes:
Example Data
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: